<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Ai-Safety on Local First AI</title><link>https://localfirstai.eu/tags/ai-safety/</link><description>Recent content in Ai-Safety on Local First AI</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://localfirstai.eu/tags/ai-safety/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Part That Looked Fine</title><link>https://localfirstai.eu/posts/2026-09-30-the-part-that-looked-fine/</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://localfirstai.eu/posts/2026-09-30-the-part-that-looked-fine/</guid><description>On 29 September the Malaga-AI study group closed its 2026 cohort at 42 Málaga with four projects on testing AI: sycophancy in relationship advice, bias in funding narratives, political flattery across 51,000 calls, and what happens when a model rewrites its own instructions five times. In three of them, the first score you&amp;#39;d look at was reassuring and a second one wasn&amp;#39;t. What they measured, what they found, and what their own caveats said.</description></item></channel></rss>